Historically, the cable industry has had two areas that has generated very good returns for shareholders:
- Distribution companies / cable channels. They monetize content.
- Infrastructure companies that own the physical coaxial cables.
Historically, the cable industry has had two areas that has generated very good returns for shareholders:
Contango Ore recently announced a joint venture with Royal Gold (press release). Royal Gold will invest $5M initially with an option to increase its ownership in the project. It looks like I was too optimistic in my assessment of the company. I thought that the company was ready to advance the deposit to production. The terms of the joint venture suggest that this isn’t a sure thing. The partners will likely need some luck to find more ore to make the deposit economic.
Looking back on my analysis of junior miners, I did not do a very good job in spotting deposits that would turn into profitable mines. Nevertheless I managed to make money by playing the volatility and by being lucky.
There are some areas in technology that have reached maturity and are at the point of being good enough. Take JPEG image compression for example. This old technology is used on websites everywhere to compress images. There is a newer JPEG2000 format which is technically superior. However, this superior technology has seen very little adoption on websites. Internet speeds are so fast that the benefits (webpages loading slightly faster) aren’t important enough for webmasters to switch.
For some shareholders, there may be a disappointing future ahead. Once the demand for more computing power stops, there is no longer room to create value with newer technology. Often what happens is that mainstream consumer demand goes away first. This can devastate the business model of companies developing new technology as it can only be sold on a smaller scale to niche markets.
I have a short position in Great Panther Silver because it seems like the company does not have strong cash flows.
Market cap: US$156M
Great Panther is listed on both the AMEX/NYSE MKT (symbol: GPL) and the TSX (symbol: GPR).
Cost to borrow: 3.625%
Conn’s originations seem to exceed the amount of money lent to its customers.
In FY2014, Conn’s originations were $1,075M.
It provided $757.2M in in-house financing, including down payments and excluding insurance.
The ratio between originations versus in-house financing was ~142%.
My diagram compares the Static Loss data presented in the Q2 2014 10-Q versus the 2013 10-K. For some reason the numbers are different and I have no idea why. I honestly don’t have any good theories.
(This is not a short writeup where I say what I truly think. I don’t like doing such writeups because I don’t want to get sued.)
In a nutshell, I think that it is worth taking a deep dive into Conn’s lending practices. In my opinion, the 10-Ks and 10-Qs seem to ignore some important ‘nuances’ of Conn’s lending practices.
Search engine optimization is about getting a website to rank higher in search engines. The goal is to increase web traffic without having to pay for ads.
This primer on search engine optimization is relevant to these stocks:
There are subsidies specific to residential solar that aren’t available to other forms of solar. Essentially, homes without solar subsidize the ones with solar by paying higher electricity rates. I don’t think that this is sustainable in the long run. For there to be more residential solar, electricity rates will have to go higher and higher. (Ironically this improves the economics of subsidized residential solar.) At some point, I think that voters will ask for lower electricity bills. Eventually, politicians “ought” to reduce residential solar subsidies.
(The analysis in this post is superficial. I apologize in advance.)