Glenn Chan's Random Notes on Investing

CACC Part 3: Why Credit Acceptance is brilliant

Advertisements

In my opinion, Credit Acceptance has excellent execution across all areas of its operations:

  1. Creating value for dealerships.
  2. Servicing loans efficiently and keeping costs low.
  3. Learning how to underwrite well across a wide range of situations.
  4. Being disciplined in underwriting.

Very few companies do all four of these things well.

Benefits for dealers

Dealers can outsource underwriting and servicing (mostly)

The design of Credit Acceptance’s program is such that the dealer can focus on selling cars rather than worrying about underwriting and servicing loans.  In practice, the dealer still has to put in a lot of work.  They have to understand Credit Acceptance’s stipulations (stips) and they have to understand how to structure profitable loans with Credit Acceptance.

One of the major changes that a dealer has to make is to ensure a suitable inventory of vehicles for subprime buyers.  The dealer has to buy cheap vehicles (in the $3000-$6000+ range) and sell them at very high markups.  The mileage on these vehicles cannot be too high.  The end goal is:

  1. High markups.
  2. A vehicle that the lender likes.
  3. Monthly payments that the buyer can afford.  The vehicles cannot be too expensive.

By structuring the deal in this manner, the dealer can generate an immediate cash profit on the sale of the vehicle due to the advance from Credit Acceptance.  On top of that, there is a future profit on the back-end as Credit Acceptance collects on the loan.  Credit Acceptance’s underwriting risk is reasonable because the dealer pays fixed fees to be on the program, the dealer has some skin in the game, and because shortfalls in collections come out of the dealer’s holdback on the loan pool.

Guaranteed credit approval

According to the website insider-car-buying-tips.com (here and here), Credit Acceptance is the easiest company to get a loan from.  They offer financing across a wide range of borrower situations and more or less offer guaranteed credit approval, a feat that other lenders simply do not match.

For BHPH dealers who use Credit Acceptance’s program, this is helpful because it allows them to take on customers that they might otherwise turn away because they don’t understand the underwriting risks for that customer.  For example, a BHPH dealer might automatically reject any buyer with more than one bankruptcy or repossession.  The second benefit to BHPH dealers is that they can advertise guaranteed credit approval (where legally permitted).

For dealers who do not finance their own customers, the guaranteed credit approval is also extremely helpful.  It allows them to make sales that they would otherwise be unable to make.  Secondly, dealers now know that they can finance any customer who walks onto the lot.  They do not have to engage in “yo-yo financing”.  Some dealers will allow spot delivery of a car before financing is in place.  The customer will drive home to tell friends and family about his/her new purchase and develop an emotional attachment to the car.  Meanwhile, the dealer is submitting loan applications to various funding sources and trying to arrange financing.  If the financing falls through, the dealer will have to call the buyer and take back the car.  This results in a failed sale and a customer that will likely never do business with the lot again.

Software

Credit Acceptance’s CAPS system helps dealer easily figure out deals that (A) the buyer can afford and (B) will generate profits for the dealership.  As an additional benefit, loan pre-approvals are nearly instantaneous (most lenders take hours to pre-approve a loan application).  The system also works during evenings and weekends when other lenders may be closed and do not process loans.

Training and support

In subprime, the buyer generally needs to pay an extremely high mark-up on the car so that the principal balance on the loan is very high.  The loan-to-value of the loan is intentionally inflated (this may be unintuitive because other lenders do not like high LTV).  To achieve this, the dealer can advertise inflated prices for its cars (this makes it slightly more difficult to sell to prime buyers).  Or, it can advertise reasonable prices and simply tell the customer that the price needs to be marked up for the car to be financed (this is probably illegal).  Or, it can have some cars without a displayed retail price.  The latter allows a dealership to target both prime and subprime buyers.  The difficulty with this tactic is that the salespeople have to actively pre-qualify customers to determine their creditworthiness.  It is not good if a subprime customer falls in love with a car only to discover that they need to pay much higher than retail or that they cannot buy the car.

At the end of the day, dealers that cater mainly to prime buyers need to spend the time to learn and develop efficient business processes to handle the deep subprime market.  Credit Acceptance tries its best to help them through their online CAPS university and marketing area managers (MAMs).  Credit Acceptance provides lists of the top 25 cars being financed with Credit Acceptance to help dealers get the right inventory.

A low-cost operator

Credit Acceptance has taken many steps to try to run more efficiently and to lower its costs:

Disadvantages of Credit Acceptance

In practice, Credit Acceptance has a rather high attrition rate.  Every year, around a quarter of their dealers will stop originating new loans.

Credit Acceptance versus other lenders

Nicholas Financial (NICK)

As a stock, Nicholas Financial has performed very well.  Their impressive track record suggests that they are very good at what they do.

NICK takes hours to approve loan applications (according to its website) and rejects 85% of potential clients (according to this VIC writeup).  (Their rejection rate will likely vary over time as the company raises/lowers its standards.)  This is a very different style of underwriting than Credit Acceptance.  Whereas Credit Acceptance tries to accurately price everything to offer guaranteed credit approval, Nicholas Financial is selective.  NICK’s competitive advantage seems to be in finding talented human beings who can underwrite just as well or better than a computer model.  In my opinion, Credit Acceptance generates a lot more value for dealers than NICK.  Dealers want all to finance all of their customers and do not want to wait hours for preapproval.

NICK’s business works well when it can selectively pick off good loans.  In highly competitive environments it has seen its earnings shrink despite opening more branches.  While Nicholas has a good business model and has been well managed under Vosotas (who has now left the board and may very well be selling his shares), NICK seems to be at the mercy of the competitive environment.  It could be the case that Credit Acceptance is less affected by competition due to superior collections and the value that it adds to dealers.

NICK is a no-frills company.  It does not hire cleaning staff.  Employees have to clean their own offices.  According to comments at glassdoor.com, its computers are antiquated.  One employee commented that there is no Internet access or “modern technology”.  I am surprised that this ex-software company uses little technology to make their business run more efficiently.

Consumer Portfolio Solutions (CPSS)

They have had problems in the past with poor underwriting leading to significant losses.  Given CPS’ extremely high debt to equity ratio (currently 13, in the same ballpark as its historical range), it is likely that CPS has loose origination standards.  The issue with maintaining a very high debt-to-equity ratio is that the company will grow very quickly in favorable competitive environments.  (And if it isn’t growing quickly, then they are underwriting poorly.)  However, it is difficult to reinvest large sums of new capital while maintaining the same underwriting quality.  If the company continues to maintain high levels of leverage for extended periods of time, it is highly likely that the company is loosening its standards so that it can rapidly expand.

They seem to be sophisticated on the operations side (similar to Credit Acceptance).

Westlake Financial Services (private)

Westlake is very similar to Credit Acceptance and seems to be their most direct competitor.  Some dealerships will use both.  The dealer will first use Credit Acceptance’s CAPS software to structure a Credit Acceptance deal.  They do not use Westlake’s software because Credit Acceptance approves more borrowers than Westlake.  This suggests that Credit Acceptance has a deeper understanding of underwriting.  After figuring out a Credit Acceptance deal that is profitable for the dealership, the dealer will then shop around for the best financing (Westlake, BHPH, etc.).

Westlake does not have fixed fees and is therefore more attractive to very small dealerships.  However, Westlake has pooling/holdback agreements similar to Credit Acceptance.  I believe pooling protects Westlake somewhat against dealers stuffing them with bad loans and keeping good loans for themselves.

The company may have had underwriting issues that led it to suffer losses in 2009.  One article on the company states that the founder put in $90M of his own money into the company.  Around that time, the company started looking around for investors.  Judging from an investor presentation on the company website, it seems that the company targets a return on equity rather than return on assets.  This is perhaps not the smartest thing to do from a risk management standpoint.  Targeting return on equity encourages managers to hit the target by increasing leverage rather than operating performance.  Targeting a set return is also not a good idea in very competitive underwriting environments.  Disciplined underwriting requires a company to stop underwriting if the risk/reward is not there.

Comparing ROA to ROE, it seems that the company maintains a medium amount of leverage at around three or four times debt to equity.  This suggests to me that Credit Acceptance has superior underwriting discipline.  In any case, it is clear that Credit Acceptance is better managed than Westlake (which is probably the second best managed company in deep subprime).

Car-Mart (CRMT)

As mentioned in a previous post, Car-Mart has a very unique selling proposition in offering ultra-low downpayments of $99.  (I believe that this offer is targeted at subprime buyers above deep subprime.)  Because they finance their own deals, they can be more entrepreneurial and innovative in their underwriting.  The problem with specialty lenders is that they have to protect themselves against dealers giving them only their bad loans.  Many specialty lenders like Credit Acceptance will rate their dealers or only do business with good dealers.  They have to be extremely careful when offering new programs because it may be exploited in ways that they did not anticipate.  Because a BHPH dealer has more control over the loan origination, I think that they can be a little nimbler in spotting market opportunities.  Of course, running a BHPH operation is still extremely challenging as it is difficult to find managers who are good at running a car dealership and ensuring good underwriting.

The integration between running the dealership and financing customers can create some value.  A specialty finance company does not care about the value of a repeat customer while a BHPH dealer does.  A specialty finance company will be more likely to repossess quickly while a BHPH dealer will work on ensuring good relationships with customers.  If a BHPH dealer works with only one lender, the paperwork process is much simpler.  With Credit Acceptance, 75% of all loan applications are not funded right away due to problems with the application (according to this training website).

BHPH dealers and GPS-SID

When it comes to the use of GPS and SID devices, a BHPH dealer can extract greater value out of such devices.

Some BHPH dealers secretly install a GPS device into the customer’s car.  (The legality of this is unclear… but some BHPH dealers do it anyways.)  If the car needs to be located, it is unlikely that the buyer will remove the GPS device because they simply aren’t aware of it.

Regardless of whether or not a GPS device is disclosed, a BHPH dealer can offer free oil changes and “safety checks” to its customers.  After a loan is paid off, the BHPH can use the oil change as an excuse to remove the device.  Recycling these units allows the dealer to lower the costs of using these devices.

A SID (starter interrupt device) provides reminders to customers about unpaid amounts and will disable the car from starting if the borrower is delinquent.  A bad situation can happen if the car is disabled on a workday and the driver really needs to get to work.  The borrower will likely try to disable or remove the SID.  It can also be extremely frustrating for the borrower if the car is disabled when the borrower is far away from home.  This can lead to an angry borrower who will not become a repeat customer.  They may damage the car prior to repossession.  A SID works best when it is disclosed to the buyer and the buyer understands that they should proactively work with the lender to avoid their car from being disabled.  Knowing what was disclosed to the customer aids in collections efforts.

The cost-effectiveness of GPS-SID devices is unclear.  If the collections team is very good at skip tracing, then a GPS is not very economic given that very few delinquent borrowers turn into very difficult repossessions where the car cannot be located.  The benefit of SID is in reducing the cost of collections and hopefully reducing delinquencies (they do not really help in repossessions).  However, borrowers often try to disable or remove the SID system.

Credit Acceptance does not subsidize the cost of GPS-SID units on its loans.  It receives commissions every time a dealer purchases a GPS-SID device through Credit Acceptance (as disclosed in the 10-Ks).

The bottom line

It its niche, I think that Credit Acceptance is clearly better managed than its next closest competitor (Westlake).

Compared to other players in the subprime auto industry, Credit Acceptance has higher returns on capital and demonstrated growth during industry downturns (2007-2009 and 2011-present) while competitors saw their earnings shrink or go negative.  I think that it is the best managed company is a very competitive and cyclical industry.

*Disclosure:  Long CACC common shares.

Links

Auto Dealer People forum

800notes – This website has notes on phone numbers that originate a lot of calls.  Retail customers and an employee go back and forth about cars with GPS-SID that are being serviced by Credit Acceptance.

Car buying tips for Credit Acceptance – This excellent website (mentioned earlier) explains how to game Credit Acceptance’s CAPS system.  The website takes affiliate commissions from Funding Way, Auto Credit Express, etc.  There may be a minor bias due to the affiliate commissions.

Advertisements

Advertisements